Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi

Ahmad, A., Wantu, F., & Ismail, D. (2023). Convergence of Constitutional Interpretation to the Test of Laws Through a Constitutional Dialogue Approach. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk3038

Ali, M., Aditya, Z., & Fuadi, A. (2021). Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Pesisir : Urgensi Harmonisasi Regulasi Pengelolaan Pesisir Terpadu. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1745

Ali, M., Hilipito, M., & Asy’ari, S. (2016). Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru. , 12, 631-662. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310

Ali, M., Widjaja, A., & Hilipito, M. (2019). Tenggang Waktu Konstitusionalitas dan Kebersesuaian Undang-Undang dengan UUD 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1548

Amin, F. (2025). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Prinsip Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia: Studi Putusan Judicial review Tahun 2019–2024. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i6.1856

Anjari, W. (2019). Kedudukan Asas Legalitas Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006 dan 025/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1611

Appleby, G. (2021). The 2018 Australian High Court Constitutional Term: Placing the Court in Its Inter-Institutional Context. University of New South Wales law journal, 44. https://doi.org/10.53637/uezu3787

Apse, D. (2024). Legislative preparatory materials and other sources of legal aid. Legislation and its result in Latvia: lessons of the past, modern trends, problems and solutions. https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.82.24

Arman, Z., & Aziz, L. (2025). Hermeneutika dalam Interpretasi Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2021: Menelusuri Perbedaan Makna Kenaikan PPN 12%. Jurnal Jejak Hukum Indonesia (JHI). https://doi.org/10.63462/51nwgy29

Arnold, R. (2024). Constitutional justice and the realization of the key values of constitutionalism. Philosophy of law and general theory of law. https://doi.org/10.21564/2707-7039.2.318389

Atqiya, A., Nasoha, A., Faradina, A., Putri, A., & Widianingrum, R. (2024). Pancasila dan Hukum Internasional : Kajian tentang Prinsip Kedaulatan dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Indonesia. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v3i1.1109

Balkin, J. (2007). Original Meaning and Constitutional Redemption. Constitutional commentary, 24, 427-532.

Batanova, N. (2025). The phenomenon of constitutional and legal responsibility: from a value characteristic to the formation of the axiometry of modern constitutionalism. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.1.14

Besso, M. (2005). Constitutional Amendment Procedures and the Informal Political Construction of Constitutions. The Journal of Politics, 67, 69 - 87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00308.x

Blackstone, B. (2013). An Analysis of Policy-Based Congressional Responses to the U.S. Supreme Court's Constitutional Decisions. Law & Society Review, 47, 199-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12006

Błaszczyk, C. (2021). Interpretation in the service of doctrine. Constitutional Originalism in the United States. , 67, 9-36. https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2020.67.2.9-36

Braver, J. (2016). Exporting U.S. Counter-Interpretation: Redeeming Constitutional Supremacy in the U.K.. **.

Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014

Campos, A. (2018). Legislative evaluation and social credibility in parliamentary work. Magazine of El Colegio de San Luis, 8, 237-268. https://doi.org/10.21696/rcsl8152018748

Christia, A., Wardhani, L., Tristy, M., & Surya, F. (2024). Politik Hukum Eksekusi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol9.iss1.art4

Christie, G. (2019). The Well-Intentioned Purpose but Weak Epistemological Foundation of Originalism. Connecticut Law Review, 51, 451.

Crawford, L. (2025). Legalism and the Lack of Constitutional Amendment. Federal Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/fed.2025.10010

Danilyuk, S. (2024). Constitutional Hermeneutics As the Art of Searching for Socially Constructive Regulative Idea. Journal of Russian Law. https://doi.org/10.61205/s160565900031064-4

Devitskii, E. (2024). Proportionality Test: From the Court to the Legislator. Academic Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.17150/1819-0928.2024.25(3).405-415

Dixon, R. (2009). Updating Constitutional Rules. The Supreme Court Review, 2009, 319 - 346. https://doi.org/10.1086/653651

Drinóczi, T., Gárdos-Orosz, F., & Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Z. (2019). Formal and Informal Constitutional Amendment in Hungary. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3479290

Elisabet., & Memi, C. (2019). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Dalam Pembentukan Norma Baru (Suatu Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/Puu-Xii/2014 Jo Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/Puu-Xiv/2016). Jurnal Hukum Adigama. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2843

Enicov, V. (2023). Controversies of some constitutional interpretations of laws. National Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2022.2(248).03

Fatmawaty, A., & Sutanto, C. (2025). Analisis Dampak Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Putusan Mahkam Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v25i2.6689

Fattah, M., & Mustaufiy, A. (2024). Judicial review Undang-Undang Perkawinan: Floating Execution Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum. Hudan Lin Naas: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.28944/hudanlinnaas.v5i2.1904

Fauzani, M., Deladetama, N., Basrun, M., & Anam, M. (2020). Living constitution in Indonesia: The Study of Constitutional Changes Without A Formal Amendment. Lentera Hukum. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v7i1.13953

Fish, E. (2015). Choosing Constitutional Remedies. **. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2579113

Flassy, M., Idris, U., & Muttaqin, M. (2025). Implementing Constitutional Court Decisions: Case Study Of The Revision Of The 2024 Regional Head Election Law In Indonesia. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.732

Gillman, H. (1997). The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the “Living constitution” in the Course of American State-Building. Studies in American Political Development, 11, 191 - 247. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x00001656

Goldsworthy, J. (2009). Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism. Philosophy Compass, 4, 682-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00207.x

Guswara, A., & Nasution, A. (2023). Dinamika Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dan 54/PUU-XXI/2023. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7844

Hadiprabowo, M., Wasino, W., & Kurniawan, E. (2024). Pancasila in Modern Indonesian Legal Reform: Addressing Current Cases and International Debates on Ideology and Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.18922

Hakki, D. (2023). Judicial review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia against Pancasila. Journal of Law and Regulation Governance. https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v1i2.13

Halili, H., Hartini, S., & Arpannudin, I. (2018). Kinerja Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam mewujudkan electoral justice pada pilkada serentak tahun 2017. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v15i2.20647

Hangabei, S., Dimyati, K., Absori, A., & Akhmad, A. (2021). The Ideology Of Law: Embodying The Religiosity Of Pancasila In Indonesia Legal Concepts. LAW REFORM. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37554

Harianti, I., Amri, A., Muthar, A., Rato, D., & Basarah, A. (2024). Pancasila as The Basis Of Constitutional Law: Shaping Legal Principles and Jurisprudence. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.4814

Hartono, B. (2024). The Value of Pancasila as an Ideological Based for the Development of the Legal System in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.4.6

Hasanah, N., & Triadi, I. (2025). Judicial Activism of the Constitutional Court in Progressive Law Discovery: Limitations, Checks and balances, and the Threat of Becoming a Positive Legislator. Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review. https://doi.org/10.65101/dv2vw205

Hendrianto, S. (2023). The Indonesian Constitutional Court and Informal Constitutional Change. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4340658

Hermawan, M. (2025). Gregory Leyh’s Approach To Constitutional Hermeneutics: A Critical Analysis Of Legal Hermeneutics According To Hans-Georg Gadamer. Masalah-Masalah Hukum. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.2.2025.255-268

Heryansyah, D., & Nugraha, H. (2020). Relevansi Putusan Uji Materi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Sistem Checks and balances dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. , 2, 353-379. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.353-379

Hidayat, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum melalui Penafsiran Hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v8i2.2682

Johan, M., Putra, A., Freaddy, F., Busroh, M., (2023). Analisa Hukum Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 65/PUU-Viii/2010 Dihubungkan Keabsahan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Peristiwa Pidana Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lexstricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i3.15

Jurdi, F., & Yani, A. (2023). Legitimacy of Non-Formal Constitutional Reforms and Restrictions on Constitutionalism. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2024

Kay, R. (2008). Original Intention and Public Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation. Legislation & Statutory Interpretation.

Kim, J. (2024). The Boundary Between Legislation and Adjudication: The Limits of Legal Interpretation. The Korean Association of Civil Law. https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2024.108.3

Knopff, R., Evans, R., Baker, D., & Snow, D. (2017). Dialogue: Clarified and Reconsidered. Osgoode Hall Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2905095

Kuzubova, A. (2023). Potential Influence Of Moral And Legal Values On The Legislative Process. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science. https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-4-313-317

Leyh, G. (1988). Toward a Constitutional Hermeneutics. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111128

Ma'ruf, A., & Rahmat, H. (2023). Pancasila dalam Konteks Kenegaraan Republik Indonesia: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual. Trends in Applied Sciences, Social Science, and Education. https://doi.org/10.71383/tase.v1i2.34

Maulidi, M. (2019). Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627

McAffee, T. (1986). Constitutional Interpretation—The Uses and Limitations of Original Intent. **.

McGinnis, J., & Rappaport, M. (2009). Original Methods Originalism: A New Theory of Interpretation and the Case Against Construction. Northwestern University Law Review, 103, 751-802.

McGinnis, J., & Rappaport, M. (2019). Unifying Original Intent and Original Public Meaning. Social Science Research Network.

Mihradi, R. (2017). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang/Perppu. , 3. https://doi.org/10.33751/.v3i2.394

Mihradi, R., Butarbutar, D., Lathif, N., & Marselina, T. (2021). The Decision of the Constitutional Court Which Is Positive Legislature and Their Implications on Substantial Democracy in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3269

Muda, I., & Kadafi, M. (2013). Penerapan Konsep Hukum Pembangunan Ekonomi Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Eksploitasi Pekerja Alih Daya. **. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v6i1.116

Muttaqin, L., Omara, A., Atmoredjo, S., & Ar, F. (2025). Is the Legislator in the Constitutional Court? Examining the Tension Between Judiciary and Democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13494

Nasoha, A., Atqiya, A., Rahmawati, D., Az-Zahra, Z., & Shafira, N. (2024). Integrasi Nilai Pancasila dalam Sistem Hukum Konstitusi Indonesia: Implikasi terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Adat. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i4.931

Nggilu, N., Wahidullah, W., Noviawati, E., & Ismail, D. (2024). Indonesia’s Constitutional Identity: A Comparative Study of Islamic Constitutionalism. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.29851

Nugraha, X., Katherina, A., Ramadhanty, S., & Tanbun, E. (2019). Constitutional Question: Alternatif Baru Pelindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Concrete Review di Indonesia (Constitutional Question: New Alternative to Protect Citizen’s Constitutional Right From Concrete Review in Indonesia). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1209

Oira, N. (2023). Fundamental Constitutional Changes Without Participation of the Constituent Power. The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010015

Palguna, I., Kumara, B., & Atmaja, D. (2023). “Originalism” of Interpretation in the United States Constitution. Sriwijaya Law Review. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol7.iss2.2134.pp190-208

Passchier, R. (2017). Informal Constitutional Change: Constitutional Change Without Formal Constitutional Amendment in Comparative Perspective. **.

Pereira, D. (2024). The Influence of Constitutional Objectives on Constitutional Interpretation: Some Propositions Based on the Brazilian and German Cases. Verfassung in Recht und Übersee. https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2024-2-260

Postnikov, A. (2024). Constitution and Development of Constitutional Analysis. Journal of Russian Law. https://doi.org/10.61205/s160565900028066-6

Powell, H. (1985). The Original Understanding of Original Intent. Harvard Law Review, 98, 885. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340880

Powellf, J., Andersen, E., & Bezanson, R. (2017). The Modern Misunderstanding of Original Intent H. **.

Pozas-Loyo, A., Saavedra-Herrera, C., & Pou-Giménez, F. (2022). When More Leads to More: Constitutional Amendments and Interpretation in Mexico 1917-2020. Law & Social Inquiry, 50, 1 - 32. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.35

Pradana, S., Mannan, K., Annisa, A., & Prayudi, P. (2024). Komodifikasi Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia melalui Ikhtiar Aktivisme Yudisial. Amsir Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v5i2.317

Prasadhana, G., Yusa, I. (2022). Konstitusionalitas Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2022.v10.i09.p14

Pulido, M. (2021). Constitutional Hermeneutic Principles and Constitutional Interpretation. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_91-1

Putra, A. (2022). Sifat Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Yudisial. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i3.425

Putri, R., Sabatira, F., Davey, O., Saputra, M., & Natamiharja, R. (2023). Indonesia's Democracy And Constitution: Reflecting Human Rights Based On Pancasila. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation. https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v7i2.7235

Rasch, B. (2006). Amendment Procedures and Constitutional Stability. **. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2332.003.0019

Ritonga, F. (2023). Keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia Dalam Perannya Menjaga Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara (Suatu Perwujudan Nyata). Honeste Vivere. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i2.210

Roach, K. (2006). Dialogue or Defiance: Legislative Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions in Canada and the United States. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4, 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol008

Rofiqi, A., & Hadi, S. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Putusan MK Nomor 79/PUU-Xvii/2019 Tentang Revisi Kedua Undang-Undang Kpk. Constitution Journal. https://doi.org/10.35719/constitution.v2i1.54

Sachs, S. (2015). Originalism as a Theory of Legal Change. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 38, 817.

Safriadi, S., Rani, F., & Sjafei, M. (2018). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Syiah Kuala Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v2i3.11762

Sagala, P., Lubis, A., & Lubis, T. (2025). Uniformity in The Legislative Process Following Constitutional Court Rulings. Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i1.473

Santy, S. (2024). Exploring the Intersection of Pancasila and Human Rights in Indonesian Law. Sinergi International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.61194/education.v2i2.142

Saragih, G., Ishwara, A., & Putra, R. (2024). Evaluation of the Implementation of Pancasila Values and Human Rights Enforcement in Indonesian Judicial System Through Constitutional Approach. Reformasi Hukum. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082

Schweber, H. (2020). "The Hermeneutic Implications of Constitutional Amendment". **. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-wq6qw

Setiawan, R. (2025). Kewenangan Judicial review Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin. https://doi.org/10.63822/gk8f1y93

Shustrov, D. (2021). Constitution-transforming informal methods of changing the Constitution of the Russian Federation: between validity and constitutionality. Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2021-5-42-75

Sidi, R., Basri, H., Akbar, A., , I., & Sinaga, N. (2021). Staatsfundamentalnorm (Pancasila) Sebagai Bahan Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.167

Sihombing, U. (2020). Penafsiran atas Makna Agama di dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 dan Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1641

Silalahi, A., Mustansyir, R., & Tjahyadi, S. (2025). Rethinking Constitutional Interpretation through Joseph Raz’s Analytical Jurisprudence. Constitutional Review. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1118

Simanungkalit, D., & Vanny, V. (2025). Misreading the Court Decision: Reflecting on Constitutional Interpretation In Nusantara Capital Law Formation. Jurnal Ius Constituendum. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.12531

Siregar, E., Utomo, C., & Sholeh, M. (2024). Pancasila in the Context of Indonesian Legal Reform: A Critical Evaluation and International Debate. Journal of Law and Legal Reform. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.18923

Skrzydło, J. (2024). The myth of "neutral principles of interpreting the law". Original interpretation of the Constitution in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. Political thought. Political Thought. https://doi.org/10.31268/mppt.2024.3

Staden, M. (2020). The Theoretical (and Constitutional) Underpinnings of Statutory Interpretation. **, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928480792/01

Stojanović, D. (2016). The Constitutional Court in light of interpretive decisions in normative control proceedings. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law in Niš, 55, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1672037s

Suanro, S. (2016). Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi. , 9, 131-150. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i2.21

Subawa, M., Hermanto, B., & Giri, N. (2025). Dynamics Of Pancasila As A Basis For The Quality Of Indonesian Legislation: A Positive Law Perspective And The Constitutional Court's Decision. Constitutional Law Society. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v4i01.94

Sudaryanto, A. (2012). Tugas Dan Peran Hakim Dalam Melakukan Penemuan Hukum/Rechtvinding (i.c Penafsiran Konstitusi sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum). **.

Sudrajat, T. (2018). Harmonization of Regulation Based on Pancasila Values Through the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Constitutional Review. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev426

Suganda, A., & Suganda, G. (2024). Principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law in Pancasila Democracy. International Journal of Religion. https://doi.org/10.61707/p5zdqz26

Sujono, I. (2022). Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835

Thohari, A. (2019). The Manifestation Of The Rechtsidee Of Pancasila In Regulating The Constitutional Rights In Indonesia. , 4. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v4i2.23

Triningsih, A., & Agustine, O. (2020). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Memuat Keadilan Sosial dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1648

Vatamaniuk, A. (2025). Constitutional judicial dialogue: international standards and judicial practice. Constitutional Legal Academic Studies. https://doi.org/10.24144/2663-5399.2025.1.07

Vilova, T., & Permilovsky, M. (2024). Medical Care in Axio-Teleological Interpretation (Based on the Materials of the Constitutional Judicial Practice). State power and local self-government. https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2024-9-18-22

Wahyudi, N., & Octarina, N. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Constitutional Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Hak Mantan Narapidana Untuk Menjadi Pejabat Publik Yang Dipilih. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v8i5.22472

Weinrib, J. (2022). What Is Purposive Interpretation?. University of Toronto Law Journal, 0, -. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2021-0116

Weis, L. (2014). Constitutional Amendment Rules and Interpretive Fidelity to Democracy. Melbourne University Law Review, 38.

Whittington, K. (1999). Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial review. **. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-3036

Witt, A., Huggins, A., Governatori, G., & Buckley, J. (2023). Encoding legislation: a methodology for enhancing technical validation, legal alignment and interdisciplinarity. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09350-1

Yosef, B. (2023). A double-edged sword: Constitutional dialogue confined. International Journal of Constitutional Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad004

Yuliana, A. (2024). Peran dan Potensi Sinergi Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pemerintah dalam Mewujudkan Praktik Good governance di Indonesia. Forschungsforum Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.35586/flj.v1i01.7160

Yusuf, A., Namruddin, R., Mirfan, M., Jumarlis, M., & Mahka, M. (2025). Menggugat Sistem Reaktif: Kajian Diskualifikasi Calon Dalam Putusan Mk Pilkada 2024 Dan Kebutuhan Reformulasi Hukum Pemilu. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v7i2.6311

Yuswanto, Y., & Arif, Y. (2019). Diskursus Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Pasca Putusan MK No. 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan No. 56/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1542