Diversitas Isu SDGs dalam Hubungan Internasional

Authors

Arif Wicaksa, Universitas Riau; Syahroni Alby, Universitas Riau; Rahmi Yulia, Universitas Riau; Purwasandi, Universitas Riau; Umunnisa Hidayati, Universitas Riau; Fatmawati, Universitas Riau; Arya Luthfi Permadi, Universitas Riau; Munawir Siahaan, Universitas Riau; Dhanang Fawaiz Akbar, Universitas Riau

Keywords:

Diversitas, Isu , SDGs, Hubungan, Internasional

Synopsis

Perkembangan dunia yang semakin kompleks menuntut studi Hubungan Internasional (HI) untuk terus beradaptasi dan memperluas cakupan kajiannya. Jika pada masa awal disiplin ini berfokus pada negara dan isu keamanan tradisional, maka dinamika global kontemporer menunjukkan bahwa HI kini mencakup berbagai isu lintas sektor yang saling terhubung, mulai dari ekonomi, lingkungan, gender, hingga transformasi teknologi.  Buku Diversitas Isu SDGs dalam Hubungan Internasional hadir untuk menggambarkan keragaman tersebut dengan menempatkan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDGs) sebagai kerangka penting dalam memahami isu-isu global saat ini. Buku ini mengajak pembaca melihat bagaimana hubungan internasional tidak lagi dapat dipahami hanya melalui perspektif “high politics” seperti keamanan dan kekuatan negara, tetapi juga melalui isu-isu pembangunan dan kesejahteraan manusia yang semakin relevan dalam agenda global. Melalui berbagai pembahasan tematik,  buku ini menyoroti keterkaitan antara globalisme dan regionalisme, transformasi konsep keamanan internasional, dinamika kerja sama ekonomi regional seperti ASEAN, serta munculnya isu-isu baru seperti diplomasi energi, keamanan manusia, dan ekonomi digital. Selain itu, buku ini juga mengangkat perspektif kritis dalam studi HI, termasuk isu gender dan ketimpangan kekuasaan dalam sistem internasional. Pembahasan mengenai transisi energi, perubahan iklim, dan tantangan pembangunan berkelanjutan menunjukkan bahwa berbagai krisis global tidak hanya melibatkan negara sebagai aktor utama, tetapi juga memerlukan kerja sama lintas aktor dan lintas kawasan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andresen, S., Skjærseth, J. B., Jevnaker, T., & Wettestad, J. (2016). The paris agreement: Consequences for the EU and carbon markets? Politics and Governance, 4(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i3.652

Baruch-Mordo, S., Kiesecker, J. M., Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., & Opperman, J. J. (2019). From Paris to practice: Sustainable implementation of renewable energy goals. Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 024013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6e0

Caballero, M. D., Gunda, T., & McDonald, Y. J. (2023). Energy justice & coastal communities: The case for Meaningful Marine Renewable Energy Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, 113491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113491

Cohn, T. H. (2003). Global political economy: Theory and practice. Longman Publishing Group.

Critical minerals – topics. (n.d.). IEA. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://www.iea.org/topics/critical-minerals

Delfino Silva, E. C. (2017a). Self-Enforcing agreements under unequal nationally determined contributions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978774

Delfino Silva, E. C. (2017b). Self-Enforcing agreements under unequal nationally determined contributions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978774

DiploFoundation. (2021). Diplo. https://www.diplomacy.edu/topics/energy-diplomacy/

Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708

Fithriana, A., & Dewi, E. S. (2023). EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL: INSTITUSIONALISM UNI EROPA DALAM MENGHADAPI ISU PERUBAHAN IKLIM. Jurnal Dinamika Global, 8(2), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v8i2.1885

Gökçe, O. Z., Hatipoglu, E., & Soytas, M. A. (2021). The pacifying effect of energy dependence on interstate conflict: A Large-N analysis. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102133

Gonzales-Iwanciw, J., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., & Dewulf, A. (2023). How does the UNFCCC enable multi-level learning for the governance of adaptation? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 23(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09591-0

Griffiths, S. (2019). Energy diplomacy in a time of energy transition. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100386

Hamid, I., Alam, M. S., Kanwal, A., Jena, P. K., Murshed, M., & Alam, R. (2022). Decarbonization pathways: The roles of foreign direct investments, governance, democracy, economic growth, and renewable energy transition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(33), 49816–49831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18935-3

Healy, N., Stephens, J. C., & Malin, S. A. (2019). Embodied energy injustices: Unveiling and politicizing the transboundary harms of fossil fuel extractivism and fossil fuel supply chains. Energy Research & Social Science, 48, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.016

Hidayati, U. (2024). Exploring the Nexus of Climate Change, Energy Justice, and Sustainability. Jurnal Politik Global, 1(1), 1–20.

Huda, M. S. (2024). Renewable energy diplomacy and transitions: An environmental peacebuilding approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100815

IEA. (2021). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions – analysis. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions

IEA – International Energy Agency. (n.d.). IEA. Retrieved March 23, 2025, from https://www.iea.org/

Industrial energy consumers to White House: “No benefit” to Paris Agreement. (2017, May 16). Competitive Enterprise Institute. https://cei.org/blog/industrial-energy-consumers-to-white-house-no-benefit-to-paris-agreement/

IRENA – international renewable energy agency. (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2025, from https://www.irena.org/

Jaybhay, R. (2020, April 13). The Kootneeti. The Kootneeti. https://thekootneeti.in/2020/04/13/neo-realist-perspective-energy-security/

Jensen, L. (2024). The economic and fiscal transition costs of global climate mitigation in fossil fuel export dependent economies. Resources Policy, 96, 105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105234

Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (2024). Introduction to innovative energy services (IES) in transitioning energy markets. In Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822882-1.00007-x

Mirzania, P., Gordon, J. A., Balta-Ozkan, N., Sayan, R. C., & Marais, L. (2023). Barriers to powering past coal: Implications for a just energy transition in South Africa. Energy Research & Social Science, 101, 103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103122

Nations, U. (n.d.). United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm 1972. United Nations. Retrieved March 23, 2025, from https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

Overview of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act. (2024, December 18). KLRD. https://klrd.gov/2024/12/18/overview-of-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-law-and-the-inflation-reduction-act/

Peszko, G., Mensbrugghe, D. van der, Golub, A., Ward, J., Zenghelis, D., Marijs, C., Schopp, A., Rogers, J., & Midgley, A. (2020). Diversification and cooperation in a decarbonizing world: Climate strategies for fossil fuel-dependent countries. World Bank Publications.

Rodríguez-Fernández, L., Carvajal, A. B. F., & de Tejada, V. F. (2022). Improving the concept of energy security in an energy transition environment: Application to the gas sector in the European Union. The Extractive Industries and Society, 9, 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101045

Shapovalova, D. (2021). In defence of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. In Debating Climate Law (pp. 63–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108879064.006

Subhadra, B. G. (2011). Macro-level integrated renewable energy production schemes for sustainable development. Energy Policy, 39(4), 2193–2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.019

UNFCCC. (n.d.). United Nations Climate Change. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://unfccc.int/cop28/5-key-takeaways#end-of-fossil-fuels

Victor, D. G., Akimoto, K., Kaya, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Cullenward, D., & Hepburn, C. (2017). Prove Paris was more than paper promises. Nature, 548(7665), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/548025a

Yang, Y., Xia, S., Huang, P., & Qian, J. (2024). Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms and effects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101320

Zabelin, D., & von Dongen, D.-M. (2024, October 28). How geopolitics will both hinder and accelerate the global energy transition. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/10/geopolitics-energy-transition/

Published

April 29, 2026

Details about the available publication format: PDF

PDF

Physical Dimensions