Metodologi Penelitian Kepustakaan
Keywords:
Metodologi, Penelitian, KepustakaanSynopsis
Penulisan buku ini didorong oleh kesadaran akan pentingnya penguasaan metodologi penelitian yang kokoh, khususnya dalam ranah penelitian kepustakaan (library research), yang kerap menjadi fondasi utama bagi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, terutama di bidang humaniora, ilmu sosial, dan keagamaan. Penelitian kepustakaan seringkali dipandang sebagai metode yang lebih sederhana dibandingkan penelitian lapangan atau eksperimen. Namun, pandangan tersebut tidak sepenuhnya tepat. Penelitian kepustakaan yang berkualitas menuntut ketelitian, sistematika, dan pemahaman mendalam tentang cara menelusuri, menganalisis, serta mensintesis berbagai sumber pustaka menjadi suatu pengetahuan baru yang utuh dan bermakna. Buku ini hadir untuk memandu para pembaca, khususnya mahasiswa dan peneliti pemula, dalam menavigasi proses tersebut secara komprehensif dan terstruktur. Materi dalam buku ini disusun secara bertahap, mulai dari Hakikat dan Urgensi Penelitian Kepustakaan, Sejarah dan Perkembangan Penelitian Kepustakaan, Landasan Filosofis dan Epistemologis Penelitian Kepustakaan, Jenis-Jenis Penelitian Kepustakaan, Penelitian Kepustakaan dan Penelitian Lapangan, Tahapan Penelitian Kepustakaan, Strategi Pencarian Literatur, Data dan Sumber Data Penelitian Kepustakaan, Teknik Pengumpulan Data Kepustakaan, Teknik Analisis Data Dalam Metode Kepustakaan, dan Teknik Penulisan Kutipan dan Daftar Pustaka.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amir Hamzah. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research): Kajian Filosofis, Teoretis dan Aplikasi Proses dan Hasil. Depok: Rajawali Press.
Beaney, M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloch, M., Ali, D. M., & Lestari, R. (2023). The Influence of The Annales School And Colonial. Sunan Kalijaga: International Journal of Islamic Civilization, Volume 6, Number 2, 261.
Boaheng, I. (2024). An Essential Guide to Research Methodologies In Theology And Religious Studies. Ghana: by Noyam. doi:10.38159/npub.eb2024601.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Booth, W. C., & FitzGerald, G. G. (2016). The Craft of Research, Fourth Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., Williams, J. M., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. T. (2016). The Craft of Research. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Plessis, C. C. (2023). The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, And Synthesising. Publications. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods In Education, 8th Edition. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, : Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.: CA: Sage.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How To Conduct A Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview And Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 285-296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Flick, U. (2020). Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide To Doing A Research Project (3rd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.
George, M. W. (2008). The Elements of Library Research: What Every Student Needs to Know. DOI: 10.1515/9781400830411.
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. (2018). ROSES Reporting Standards For Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro Forma, Flow Diagram, And Descriptive Summary of The Plan And Conduct of Environmental Systematic Reviews And Systematic Maps. BioMed Central. doi:DOI:10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7.
Higgins, J. P. (2022). Cochrane Handbook For Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
JPT, H., J, T., J, C., M, C., & Li T, P. M. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. United Kingdom: Keele University.
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W., Dabic, M., & et, al. (2022). Literature Reviews As Independent Studies: Guidelines For Academic Practice. Springer Nature Link, 2577–2595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8.
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success, (3rd edition),. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin A Sage Publications.
Maida, A. H., Bupu, K., & Julianto, I. R. (2025). Pemanfaatan Literasi Perpustakaan Sebagai Pendukung Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Vol. 3 No. 2: Journal Central, 3221-3228. doi: https://doi.org/10.60145/jcp.v3i2.609.
Mareta, A., Fitrisia, A., & Fatimah, S. (2024). Berpikir Teoritis Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan:. CITIZEN: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 227-234. doi:DOI: 10.53866/jimi.v4i4.619.
McKenzie, J. E. (2021). The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design And Implementation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. doi:doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. Epub 2009 Jul 21. PMID: 19621072; P.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Page, M. J. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline For Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
PISA. (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment And Analytical Frameworks. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
Ranke, L. v. (2011). The Theory And Practice of History. New York: Routledge.
Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide For Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual For Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review As A Research Methodology: An Overview And Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), 333-339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Vlora, R. K., & Shaleha, A. (2025). User Education In Libraries: An Analysis of Strategies, Objectives, And Implementation In The Digital Era. CODEX: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. doi:https://doi.org/10.62238/codex.v1i2.263.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Published
April 2, 2026
Categories
Copyright (c) 2026 Sada Kurnia Pustaka
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Details about the available publication format: PDF
PDF
